<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Corporate guarantee deeds and later sanction letters: prior guarantees held continuing, enabling Section 7 insolvency admission; appeal dismissed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95636</link>
    <description>The appellate tribunal rejected the corporate guarantor&#039;s challenge to admission of a Section 7 application. It held that the earlier guarantee deeds remained operative because subsequent sanction letters expressly continued existing securities; the later guarantee did not novate or extinguish prior guarantee obligations, and invocation validly triggered liability, resulting in rejection of the novation defence. It further held that a consortium member could independently initiate Section 7 proceedings upon the borrower&#039;s account becoming NPA, so maintainability was upheld. Objections on insufficient stamping were treated as curable and belated, especially where stamp duty exemptions/undertakings existed, and could not defeat undisputed debt and default; the admission order was affirmed and the appeal dismissed - NCLAT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2026 07:51:52 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2026 07:51:53 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=875397" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Corporate guarantee deeds and later sanction letters: prior guarantees held continuing, enabling Section 7 insolvency admission; appeal dismissed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95636</link>
      <description>The appellate tribunal rejected the corporate guarantor&#039;s challenge to admission of a Section 7 application. It held that the earlier guarantee deeds remained operative because subsequent sanction letters expressly continued existing securities; the later guarantee did not novate or extinguish prior guarantee obligations, and invocation validly triggered liability, resulting in rejection of the novation defence. It further held that a consortium member could independently initiate Section 7 proceedings upon the borrower&#039;s account becoming NPA, so maintainability was upheld. Objections on insufficient stamping were treated as curable and belated, especially where stamp duty exemptions/undertakings existed, and could not defeat undisputed debt and default; the admission order was affirmed and the appeal dismissed - NCLAT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2026 07:51:52 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95636</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>