https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784296 Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act was applied in light of prolonged pre-trial detention and the uncertain early conclusion of trial. The Court noted that the applicant was not responsible for delay, while adjournments were caused by other accused persons; charges had not been framed, the case involved numerous witnesses and voluminous documents, and the predicate-offence trial had not begun. Balancing the twin conditions under Section 45 with the constitutional protections of personal liberty and speedy trial, the Court found that continued incarceration could not be justified solely by the statutory bar and granted bail on conditions. en-us Sat, 20 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Jan 2026 07:51:50 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784296 Section 45 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act was applied in light of prolonged pre-trial detention and the uncertain early conclusion of trial. The Court noted that the applicant was not responsible for delay, while adjournments were caused by other accused persons; charges had not been framed, the case involved numerous witnesses and voluminous documents, and the predicate-offence trial had not begun. Balancing the twin conditions under Section 45 with the constitutional protections of personal liberty and speedy trial, the Court found that continued incarceration could not be justified solely by the statutory bar and granted bail on conditions. Case-Laws Money Laundering Sat, 20 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784296