<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 62 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784306</link>
    <description>The dominant issue was whether receipts from online gaming were taxable on gross receipts under s.115BB and whether newly inserted s.115BBJ (effective AY 2024-25) was explanatory/curative so as to apply retrospectively and permit taxation on a different basis. Applying SC in Vatika Township, the Tribunal held that s.115BBJ is a new substantive charging provision introducing a flat-rate regime, not a procedural or hardship-removing amendment, and the legislature expressly made it prospective. Consequently, no retrospective application was permitted and the appellate order sustaining taxation on the basis adopted under s.115BB was upheld; the assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2026 07:51:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=875383" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 62 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784306</link>
      <description>The dominant issue was whether receipts from online gaming were taxable on gross receipts under s.115BB and whether newly inserted s.115BBJ (effective AY 2024-25) was explanatory/curative so as to apply retrospectively and permit taxation on a different basis. Applying SC in Vatika Township, the Tribunal held that s.115BBJ is a new substantive charging provision introducing a flat-rate regime, not a procedural or hardship-removing amendment, and the legislature expressly made it prospective. Consequently, no retrospective application was permitted and the appellate order sustaining taxation on the basis adopted under s.115BB was upheld; the assessee&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784306</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>