<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 89 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784333</link>
    <description>Under the GST enactments, the appellate authority may rectify defects under Section 161, but whether rectification is warranted must be decided by that authority on merits. The High Court directed the authority to consider the petitioner&#039;s pending rectification application after giving due notice and to decide it within the stipulated time.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2026 07:51:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=875356" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 89 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784333</link>
      <description>Under the GST enactments, the appellate authority may rectify defects under Section 161, but whether rectification is warranted must be decided by that authority on merits. The High Court directed the authority to consider the petitioner&#039;s pending rectification application after giving due notice and to decide it within the stipulated time.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784333</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>