<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 91 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784335</link>
    <description>Blocking of the taxpayer&#039;s ECL under Rule 86A CGST Rules was challenged for breach of natural justice and absence of legally sustainable &quot;reasons to believe.&quot; Applying HC precedent, the Court held that Rule 86A requires independent, cogent material forming the proper officer&#039;s satisfaction and cannot rest on borrowed satisfaction from enforcement reports. As no pre-decisional hearing was granted and the order merely alleged ITC from non-existent suppliers and multiple e-way bills without recording independent reasons to believe, the mandatory prerequisites of Rule 86A were not met. The Rule 86A blocking orders were quashed and the writ petition was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2026 07:51:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=875354" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 91 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784335</link>
      <description>Blocking of the taxpayer&#039;s ECL under Rule 86A CGST Rules was challenged for breach of natural justice and absence of legally sustainable &quot;reasons to believe.&quot; Applying HC precedent, the Court held that Rule 86A requires independent, cogent material forming the proper officer&#039;s satisfaction and cannot rest on borrowed satisfaction from enforcement reports. As no pre-decisional hearing was granted and the order merely alleged ITC from non-existent suppliers and multiple e-way bills without recording independent reasons to believe, the mandatory prerequisites of Rule 86A were not met. The Rule 86A blocking orders were quashed and the writ petition was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784335</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>