https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784338 Provisional attachment of bank accounts under the GST enactments was challenged, and the pending objection was directed to be decided expeditiously. The Madras HC disposed of the writ petition by requiring the first respondent to decide the petitioner's representation in Form GST DRC-22A within 30 days. It also directed the third respondent to adjust the amounts in the petitioner's bank account towards the liability so that no penal charges were levied. en-us Thu, 11 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 02 Jan 2026 07:51:51 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784338 Provisional attachment of bank accounts under the GST enactments was challenged, and the pending objection was directed to be decided expeditiously. The Madras HC disposed of the writ petition by requiring the first respondent to decide the petitioner's representation in Form GST DRC-22A within 30 days. It also directed the third respondent to adjust the amounts in the petitioner's bank account towards the liability so that no penal charges were levied. Case-Laws GST Thu, 11 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784338