<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 103 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784347</link>
    <description>Cancellation of GST registration for continuous non-filing of returns for six months was challenged on the ground of financial constraints. The HC held that the explanation for non-compliance appeared genuine and that cancellation warranted interference in writ jurisdiction. The impugned cancellation order was set aside and the registration was directed to be restored, subject to fulfillment of conditions imposed by the authority/HC, and the petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2026 07:51:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=875342" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 103 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784347</link>
      <description>Cancellation of GST registration for continuous non-filing of returns for six months was challenged on the ground of financial constraints. The HC held that the explanation for non-compliance appeared genuine and that cancellation warranted interference in writ jurisdiction. The impugned cancellation order was set aside and the registration was directed to be restored, subject to fulfillment of conditions imposed by the authority/HC, and the petition was disposed of accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784347</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>