<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2022 (6) TMI 1549 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465599</link>
    <description>Payments by the assessee to non-resident group entities for professional services were examined for withholding under s.195 and consequent disallowance under s.40(a)(i). The Tribunal held that the services were not &quot;fees for technical services/royalty&quot; under the relevant DTAAs because no technical knowledge was &quot;made available&quot;, and in certain cases the receipts were taxable, if at all, as &quot;independent personal services/other income&quot; but remained non-taxable in India in the absence of a PE; accordingly, s.195 was not attracted and disallowance under s.40(a)(i) was deleted. Separately, remittances as membership fees to a Swiss cooperative were held covered by the principle of mutuality due to complete identity between contributors and participators and absence of profit motive; hence no TDS or disallowance arose, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2026 07:07:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=875327" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2022 (6) TMI 1549 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465599</link>
      <description>Payments by the assessee to non-resident group entities for professional services were examined for withholding under s.195 and consequent disallowance under s.40(a)(i). The Tribunal held that the services were not &quot;fees for technical services/royalty&quot; under the relevant DTAAs because no technical knowledge was &quot;made available&quot;, and in certain cases the receipts were taxable, if at all, as &quot;independent personal services/other income&quot; but remained non-taxable in India in the absence of a PE; accordingly, s.195 was not attracted and disallowance under s.40(a)(i) was deleted. Separately, remittances as membership fees to a Swiss cooperative were held covered by the principle of mutuality due to complete identity between contributors and participators and absence of profit motive; hence no TDS or disallowance arose, and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jun 2022 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465599</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>