https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784266 Connected company appeals arising from rejection of company petitions were referred to mediation after the parties indicated willingness to settle but differed on the choice of mediator. With the consent of a retired High Court Judge, the Tribunal appointed the mediator, fixed remuneration and incidental expenses to be shared equally, and directed that the process be conducted under Section 424 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Section 89 CPC and the Companies (Mediation and Conciliation) Rules, 2016. The parties were directed to appear before the mediator on the specified date and complete the mediation within the stated sittings, with liberty to pursue remedies available in law after the mediation decision. en-us Mon, 08 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 01 Jan 2026 08:18:24 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784266 Connected company appeals arising from rejection of company petitions were referred to mediation after the parties indicated willingness to settle but differed on the choice of mediator. With the consent of a retired High Court Judge, the Tribunal appointed the mediator, fixed remuneration and incidental expenses to be shared equally, and directed that the process be conducted under Section 424 of the Companies Act, 2013 read with Section 89 CPC and the Companies (Mediation and Conciliation) Rules, 2016. The parties were directed to appear before the mediator on the specified date and complete the mediation within the stated sittings, with liberty to pursue remedies available in law after the mediation decision. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 08 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784266