<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2026 (1) TMI 40 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784284</link>
    <description>A protective addition cannot survive on its own once the corresponding substantive addition in the connected case has been quashed. Applying that settled principle, the Tribunal held that the protective addition in the assessee&#039;s hands had no independent basis and was not sustainable. It was therefore deleted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Jan 2026 08:18:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=875186" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2026 (1) TMI 40 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784284</link>
      <description>A protective addition cannot survive on its own once the corresponding substantive addition in the connected case has been quashed. Applying that settled principle, the Tribunal held that the protective addition in the assessee&#039;s hands had no independent basis and was not sustainable. It was therefore deleted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784284</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>