<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2006 (8) TMI 224 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49038</link>
    <description>The Tribunal affirmed that the decision in Fabworth (India) Ltd. v. CCE Nagpur did not require reconsideration regarding the recovery of excise duties and exemption notifications. The matter was referred back for further consideration to the referring Bench.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 12:43:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87518" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2006 (8) TMI 224 - CESTAT, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49038</link>
      <description>The Tribunal affirmed that the decision in Fabworth (India) Ltd. v. CCE Nagpur did not require reconsideration regarding the recovery of excise duties and exemption notifications. The matter was referred back for further consideration to the referring Bench.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49038</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>