https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465579 Under the UAPA bail restriction, the charge-sheet materials did not show reasonable grounds to believe the accusations were prima facie true on broad probabilities; the witness statements and alleged recoveries did not clearly attribute incriminating conduct to the accused, and the claimed recovery was doubtful on the possession documents. The statutory embargo on bail therefore did not operate. Continued custody for more than two years, absence of framing of charges, and the likelihood of substantial trial delay also made further detention inconsistent with the right to a speedy trial under Article 21. Bail was accordingly granted, with terms to be fixed by the Special Court. en-us Tue, 17 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 31 Dec 2025 20:13:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465579 Under the UAPA bail restriction, the charge-sheet materials did not show reasonable grounds to believe the accusations were prima facie true on broad probabilities; the witness statements and alleged recoveries did not clearly attribute incriminating conduct to the accused, and the claimed recovery was doubtful on the possession documents. The statutory embargo on bail therefore did not operate. Continued custody for more than two years, absence of framing of charges, and the likelihood of substantial trial delay also made further detention inconsistent with the right to a speedy trial under Article 21. Bail was accordingly granted, with terms to be fixed by the Special Court. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 17 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465579