https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465580 In a prosecution under the PMLA, the dominant issue was whether the applicant deserved regular bail despite allegations of involvement in laundering, including receipt of proceeds of crime and use of a forged deed in execution of a sale. The HC held that the allegations against the applicant and co-accused were serious, and parity with a co-accused released on bail was inapplicable because that co-accused stood on a different footing as a purchaser, while an alleged accomplice's bail had been rejected by a coordinate Bench. Regular bail was refused and the application was rejected. en-us Fri, 30 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 31 Dec 2025 20:13:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465580 In a prosecution under the PMLA, the dominant issue was whether the applicant deserved regular bail despite allegations of involvement in laundering, including receipt of proceeds of crime and use of a forged deed in execution of a sale. The HC held that the allegations against the applicant and co-accused were serious, and parity with a co-accused released on bail was inapplicable because that co-accused stood on a different footing as a purchaser, while an alleged accomplice's bail had been rejected by a coordinate Bench. Regular bail was refused and the application was rejected. Case-Laws Money Laundering Fri, 30 Aug 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465580