<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (7) TMI 121 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49021</link>
    <description>Clearances supplied in bulk to the bakery and catering industry, marked not for retail sale and intended for industrial use, were treated as wholesale sales, so the exemption was available. Bulk steel supplies to Government units were also held not to be retail sales because quantity and commercial context showed wholesale transactions. The 10% price preference paid by buyers to the assessee formed part of the transaction value and was includible in assessable value, as it was not a true external subsidy. Suppression of material facts sustained duty liability, while the penalty was reduced in light of the circumstances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Aug 2010 11:13:24 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87501" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (7) TMI 121 - CESTAT, BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49021</link>
      <description>Clearances supplied in bulk to the bakery and catering industry, marked not for retail sale and intended for industrial use, were treated as wholesale sales, so the exemption was available. Bulk steel supplies to Government units were also held not to be retail sales because quantity and commercial context showed wholesale transactions. The 10% price preference paid by buyers to the assessee formed part of the transaction value and was includible in assessable value, as it was not a true external subsidy. Suppression of material facts sustained duty liability, while the penalty was reduced in light of the circumstances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49021</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>