<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Cases of Red Fort blast, National Herald and IRCTC &#039;scam&#039; kept Delhi courts busy in 2025</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=66162</link>
    <description>Delhi&#039;s 2025 criminal docket combined contested use of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act and anti corruption provisions-courts criticised investigative registration practices and accepted or framed charges in multiple corruption matters-alongside terrorism prosecutions involving extradition, arrests and custodial interrogation requests in a national monument bombing and 26/11 related proceedings. Judicial scrutiny repeatedly targeted investigatory quality, jurisdictional errors, procedural overreach in content removal orders, modifications of bail and custody, acquittals where investigations were defective, and acceptance of closure reports in long running money laundering cases.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2025 10:31:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2025 10:31:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=875000" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Cases of Red Fort blast, National Herald and IRCTC &#039;scam&#039; kept Delhi courts busy in 2025</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=66162</link>
      <description>Delhi&#039;s 2025 criminal docket combined contested use of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act and anti corruption provisions-courts criticised investigative registration practices and accepted or framed charges in multiple corruption matters-alongside terrorism prosecutions involving extradition, arrests and custodial interrogation requests in a national monument bombing and 26/11 related proceedings. Judicial scrutiny repeatedly targeted investigatory quality, jurisdictional errors, procedural overreach in content removal orders, modifications of bail and custody, acquittals where investigations were defective, and acceptance of closure reports in long running money laundering cases.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2025 10:31:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=66162</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>