<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2005 (5) TMI 90 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49020</link>
    <description>Interest in tax matters is payable only where the statute expressly creates that liability. Under the Central Excise Act and Rules, no provision authorises interest on delayed payment of interest: Section 11BB is limited to interest on delayed refund of duty, and Rule 9B concerns provisional assessment only. The Tribunal could not infer a further liability or invoke any inherent power to grant it. The claim for interest on delayed payment of interest therefore fails.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2024 10:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87500" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2005 (5) TMI 90 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49020</link>
      <description>Interest in tax matters is payable only where the statute expressly creates that liability. Under the Central Excise Act and Rules, no provision authorises interest on delayed payment of interest: Section 11BB is limited to interest on delayed refund of duty, and Rule 9B concerns provisional assessment only. The Tribunal could not infer a further liability or invoke any inherent power to grant it. The claim for interest on delayed payment of interest therefore fails.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 May 2005 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49020</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>