<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (3) TMI 1569 - CUSTOMS AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465562</link>
    <description>Apple Watch, being a composite device with timekeeping and data functions, was classified by reference to its principal function under the General Rules for Interpretation and Note 3 to Section XVI. It was treated mainly as a wireless communication apparatus that transmits and receives voice, images and other data as an extension of a paired iPhone, making Heading 8517 and Tariff Item 8517 62 90 the appropriate classification. No advance ruling was issued on Apple Watch bands, including leather and non-leather bands, because the same issue was already pending before the customs adjudicating authority and was barred under the proviso to Section 281(2).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2026 12:13:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=874987" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (3) TMI 1569 - CUSTOMS AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465562</link>
      <description>Apple Watch, being a composite device with timekeeping and data functions, was classified by reference to its principal function under the General Rules for Interpretation and Note 3 to Section XVI. It was treated mainly as a wireless communication apparatus that transmits and receives voice, images and other data as an extension of a paired iPhone, making Heading 8517 and Tariff Item 8517 62 90 the appropriate classification. No advance ruling was issued on Apple Watch bands, including leather and non-leather bands, because the same issue was already pending before the customs adjudicating authority and was barred under the proviso to Section 281(2).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465562</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>