<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1752 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784212</link>
    <description>Whether an assessee, already approved for exemption under s.10(23C)(iv) for the relevant block of years, could be denied exemption at processing under s.143(1) merely because it mistakenly claimed exemption under s.10(46). The Tribunal held that an inadvertent, bona fide error in selecting the exemption provision cannot defeat a legitimate statutory claim, relying on the principle that omission or wrong claim in the return can be corrected where entitlement exists in law, and noting that approval under s.10(23C)(iv) was in force. Accordingly, the denial of exemption was unsustainable and the appellate order granting exemption under s.10(23C)(iv) was upheld; the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2025 12:43:09 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=874934" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1752 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784212</link>
      <description>Whether an assessee, already approved for exemption under s.10(23C)(iv) for the relevant block of years, could be denied exemption at processing under s.143(1) merely because it mistakenly claimed exemption under s.10(46). The Tribunal held that an inadvertent, bona fide error in selecting the exemption provision cannot defeat a legitimate statutory claim, relying on the principle that omission or wrong claim in the return can be corrected where entitlement exists in law, and noting that approval under s.10(23C)(iv) was in force. Accordingly, the denial of exemption was unsustainable and the appellate order granting exemption under s.10(23C)(iv) was upheld; the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784212</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>