<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1770 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784230</link>
    <description>Depreciation under s.32 read with s.43(6) for AY 2003-04 was disputed on the ground that certain units within a &quot;block of assets&quot; were not used during the relevant year. The HC held that, post 01.04.1999, depreciation is allowable with reference to the block, not individual assets or their attribution to specific units; if the assessee&#039;s business continues and the block is used, the entire block is treated as &quot;put to use,&quot; with adjustments only to the block&#039;s written down value for additions/deletions. The HC further held s.38(2) was inapplicable absent any non-business or personal use. Depreciation was allowed; the appeal was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2025 09:17:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=874916" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1770 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784230</link>
      <description>Depreciation under s.32 read with s.43(6) for AY 2003-04 was disputed on the ground that certain units within a &quot;block of assets&quot; were not used during the relevant year. The HC held that, post 01.04.1999, depreciation is allowable with reference to the block, not individual assets or their attribution to specific units; if the assessee&#039;s business continues and the block is used, the entire block is treated as &quot;put to use,&quot; with adjustments only to the block&#039;s written down value for additions/deletions. The HC further held s.38(2) was inapplicable absent any non-business or personal use. Depreciation was allowed; the appeal was decided in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784230</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>