<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (10) TMI 1342 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465521</link>
    <description>Preventive detention is vitiated where the Government confirms detention without independently considering the detenue&#039;s representation, notwithstanding an Advisory Board finding of sufficient cause. Article 22(5) requires consideration on the representation&#039;s own merits, while the confirmation power under the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act remains independent of the Advisory Board process. Detention is also defective where the detenue is not informed of the right to represent to the Central Government, which may revoke or modify a State detention order. Both failures invalidate the preventive detention orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2025 19:04:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=874872" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (10) TMI 1342 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465521</link>
      <description>Preventive detention is vitiated where the Government confirms detention without independently considering the detenue&#039;s representation, notwithstanding an Advisory Board finding of sufficient cause. Article 22(5) requires consideration on the representation&#039;s own merits, while the confirmation power under the Prevention of Illicit Traffic in Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act remains independent of the Advisory Board process. Detention is also defective where the detenue is not informed of the right to represent to the Central Government, which may revoke or modify a State detention order. Both failures invalidate the preventive detention orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465521</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>