<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1303 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465537</link>
    <description>Interactive flat panels with an in-built CPU, operating system, memory, storage, and input-output facilities were held to satisfy Chapter Note 5(A) to Chapter 84 as automatic data processing machines. Applying the tariff headings, section and chapter notes, and the General Rules for Interpretation, the Tribunal found their display function to be incidental to their principal data-processing role. They were therefore correctly classifiable under CTI 8471 4190 and not under CTI 8528 5900 as monitors. The Tribunal also followed prior coordinate-bench decisions on materially similar goods and distinguished the precedent relied on by the Revenue concerning an electronic white board.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2025 19:04:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=874856" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1303 - CESTAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465537</link>
      <description>Interactive flat panels with an in-built CPU, operating system, memory, storage, and input-output facilities were held to satisfy Chapter Note 5(A) to Chapter 84 as automatic data processing machines. Applying the tariff headings, section and chapter notes, and the General Rules for Interpretation, the Tribunal found their display function to be incidental to their principal data-processing role. They were therefore correctly classifiable under CTI 8471 4190 and not under CTI 8528 5900 as monitors. The Tribunal also followed prior coordinate-bench decisions on materially similar goods and distinguished the precedent relied on by the Revenue concerning an electronic white board.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465537</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>