<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (2) TMI 2149 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465540</link>
    <description>Unexplained share capital/additional application money remained taxable where the assessee failed to prove the subscriber&#039;s identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transaction. Mere PAN details and incorporation documents were held insufficient when financial statements and surrounding circumstances indicated nominal operations, minimal income, and shell-company characteristics. The tribunal applied the principle that tax authorities may examine the real nature of the transaction and test documentary form against human probabilities. On those facts, the share allotment to strangers lacked commercial substance, so the addition was upheld.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2025 13:10:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=874853" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (2) TMI 2149 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465540</link>
      <description>Unexplained share capital/additional application money remained taxable where the assessee failed to prove the subscriber&#039;s identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the transaction. Mere PAN details and incorporation documents were held insufficient when financial statements and surrounding circumstances indicated nominal operations, minimal income, and shell-company characteristics. The tribunal applied the principle that tax authorities may examine the real nature of the transaction and test documentary form against human probabilities. On those facts, the share allotment to strangers lacked commercial substance, so the addition was upheld.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Feb 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465540</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>