https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465554 In a writ challenging a revenue authority's communication and consequent notice attaching a bank account and seeking lifting of attachment with interest, the HC held that adjudication on merits was premature because the petitioner had not filed any reply to the impugned communication. On that basis, the HC declined to grant substantive relief and instead directed the petitioner to submit a reply with relevant documents within four weeks, and directed the authority to consider the reply and proceed in accordance with law; the writ petition was disposed of with these directions. en-us Wed, 09 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Dec 2025 13:12:12 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465554 In a writ challenging a revenue authority's communication and consequent notice attaching a bank account and seeking lifting of attachment with interest, the HC held that adjudication on merits was premature because the petitioner had not filed any reply to the impugned communication. On that basis, the HC declined to grant substantive relief and instead directed the petitioner to submit a reply with relevant documents within four weeks, and directed the authority to consider the reply and proceed in accordance with law; the writ petition was disposed of with these directions. Case-Laws GST Wed, 09 Apr 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465554