https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49000 The Larger Bench addressed conflicting views on the relevant date for computing the period of limitation under Section 35E of the Central Excise Act. It held that the date on which the review order was made, not issued, is crucial. Consequently, the appeals filed by the Revenue were deemed maintainable. The reference was answered in favor of the Revenue, and the appeals will proceed to be heard by the Regular Bench on their merits. en-us Thu, 17 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 07 Aug 2010 15:58:09 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49000 The Larger Bench addressed conflicting views on the relevant date for computing the period of limitation under Section 35E of the Central Excise Act. It held that the date on which the review order was made, not issued, is crucial. Consequently, the appeals filed by the Revenue were deemed maintainable. The reference was answered in favor of the Revenue, and the appeals will proceed to be heard by the Regular Bench on their merits. Case-Laws Central Excise Thu, 17 Jun 2004 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=49000