<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Place of supply for shipped goods u/s 10(1)(a): delivery location decides IGST, CGST/SGST demand quashed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95555</link>
    <description>Section 10(1)(a) of the IGST Act fixes the place of supply where the movement of goods terminates for delivery to the recipient, not when goods are handed to a common carrier or when title passes under contractual terms. As the goods were destined to recipients at locations outside the State, the supply was inter-State, attracting IGST, and not intra-State so as to permit levy of CGST/SGST on the same transaction. The show cause notice seeking CGST/SGST on a supply already exigible to IGST was held arbitrary and contrary to Section 10(1)(a) and was quashed to the extent of the impugned demand; the petition was partly allowed. - HC</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2025 13:44:20 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2025 13:44:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=874789" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Place of supply for shipped goods u/s 10(1)(a): delivery location decides IGST, CGST/SGST demand quashed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95555</link>
      <description>Section 10(1)(a) of the IGST Act fixes the place of supply where the movement of goods terminates for delivery to the recipient, not when goods are handed to a common carrier or when title passes under contractual terms. As the goods were destined to recipients at locations outside the State, the supply was inter-State, attracting IGST, and not intra-State so as to permit levy of CGST/SGST on the same transaction. The show cause notice seeking CGST/SGST on a supply already exigible to IGST was held arbitrary and contrary to Section 10(1)(a) and was quashed to the extent of the impugned demand; the petition was partly allowed. - HC</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2025 13:44:20 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95555</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>