<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1726 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, WEST BENGAL</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784186</link>
    <description>Receipt of patent-filing and related legal documentation services from foreign patent attorneys constituted an import of services, classifiable under SAC 998213 (legal documentation and certification services concerning patents and other IPR). As the supplier was located outside India and the place of supply was the recipient&#039;s location in West Bengal, the services were taxable in India. The exemption for legal services by an &quot;advocate&quot;/&quot;senior advocate&quot; under the relevant entry was held inapplicable because those terms, as defined under the Advocates Act, 1961, do not extend to foreign attorneys; consequently, the reimbursements formed part of taxable consideration. Tax was held payable by the recipient under reverse charge under Entry 2 of Notification No. 13/2017-CT (Rate).</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2025 09:30:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=874734" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1726 - AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULING, WEST BENGAL</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784186</link>
      <description>Receipt of patent-filing and related legal documentation services from foreign patent attorneys constituted an import of services, classifiable under SAC 998213 (legal documentation and certification services concerning patents and other IPR). As the supplier was located outside India and the place of supply was the recipient&#039;s location in West Bengal, the services were taxable in India. The exemption for legal services by an &quot;advocate&quot;/&quot;senior advocate&quot; under the relevant entry was held inapplicable because those terms, as defined under the Advocates Act, 1961, do not extend to foreign attorneys; consequently, the reimbursements formed part of taxable consideration. Tax was held payable by the recipient under reverse charge under Entry 2 of Notification No. 13/2017-CT (Rate).</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784186</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>