<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1703 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784163</link>
    <description>Whether the assessee&#039;s receipts disentitled it from exemption under s.11 by triggering the &quot;trade, commerce or business&quot; exclusion in s.2(15) was governed by SC&#039;s ruling that statutory bodies pursuing objects of general public utility may still qualify as charities, provided commercial receipts arising while furthering such objects remain within the 20% cap in the second proviso to s.2(15) and other conditions of s.11 are satisfied. Consequently, the assessments were set aside and remanded to the AO to redo the assessment applying the SC tests after the competent authority decides the pending s.119(2)(b) condonation request for delayed s.12AA registration; appeals were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2025 10:35:36 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=874725" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1703 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784163</link>
      <description>Whether the assessee&#039;s receipts disentitled it from exemption under s.11 by triggering the &quot;trade, commerce or business&quot; exclusion in s.2(15) was governed by SC&#039;s ruling that statutory bodies pursuing objects of general public utility may still qualify as charities, provided commercial receipts arising while furthering such objects remain within the 20% cap in the second proviso to s.2(15) and other conditions of s.11 are satisfied. Consequently, the assessments were set aside and remanded to the AO to redo the assessment applying the SC tests after the competent authority decides the pending s.119(2)(b) condonation request for delayed s.12AA registration; appeals were allowed for statistical purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>