<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1710 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784170</link>
    <description>In reassessment proceedings, service of notice under section 143(2) after a return is filed in response to notice under section 148 is a mandatory jurisdictional requirement. Where the Revenue cannot show that such notice was issued, the reassessment is vitiated and the defect is not cured by section 292BB. The reassessment framed without the required notice was therefore held invalid and the assessment order was quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2025 09:29:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=874718" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1710 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784170</link>
      <description>In reassessment proceedings, service of notice under section 143(2) after a return is filed in response to notice under section 148 is a mandatory jurisdictional requirement. Where the Revenue cannot show that such notice was issued, the reassessment is vitiated and the defect is not cured by section 292BB. The reassessment framed without the required notice was therefore held invalid and the assessment order was quashed in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784170</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>