<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1715 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784175</link>
    <description>HC held that reassessment proceedings initiated by notices under s.153C for AY 2014-15 were barred because the respondent sought to invoke the extended ten-year period despite alleged income escapement being below the statutory threshold of Rs.50,00,000. Since the recorded escapement was only Rs.26,00,000, the precondition for action beyond the normal limitation was not satisfied. Consequently, the impugned s.153C notices were quashed and set aside.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2025 09:29:25 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=874713" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1715 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784175</link>
      <description>HC held that reassessment proceedings initiated by notices under s.153C for AY 2014-15 were barred because the respondent sought to invoke the extended ten-year period despite alleged income escapement being below the statutory threshold of Rs.50,00,000. Since the recorded escapement was only Rs.26,00,000, the precondition for action beyond the normal limitation was not satisfied. Consequently, the impugned s.153C notices were quashed and set aside.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784175</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>