<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2024 (9) TMI 1858 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465517</link>
    <description>The Delhi HC condoned an 11-day delay in filing the appeal and granted interim protection against the impugned advance ruling pending further consideration. On the stay application, it issued notice, directed service through permissible modes, and recorded a prima facie view that the ruling of the Customs Authority for Advance Rulings could not be sustained, referring to an earlier decision of the Court. The impugned order was kept in abeyance until the next date of listing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2025 09:28:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=874703" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2024 (9) TMI 1858 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465517</link>
      <description>The Delhi HC condoned an 11-day delay in filing the appeal and granted interim protection against the impugned advance ruling pending further consideration. On the stay application, it issued notice, directed service through permissible modes, and recorded a prima facie view that the ruling of the Customs Authority for Advance Rulings could not be sustained, referring to an earlier decision of the Court. The impugned order was kept in abeyance until the next date of listing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465517</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>