<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Public water supply pipeline works contract tax exemption under Sl. No. 12 denied; service tax demand, interest, penalties upheld</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95520</link>
    <description>The dominant issue was whether works contract services for a public water supply scheme (pipeline laying and allied works) provided to a government authority were exempt under specified notifications/entries, including Sl. No. 12 of Notification No. 25/2012-ST. The tribunal held exemption applies only if the activities strictly fall within the notification; on examining the nature of work, the claimed exemption was denied and the corresponding service tax demand sustained, while the demand relating to exempt water-treatment/sewerage-related works (including certain underground reservoir/ranney well works) was correctly dropped. On limitation, extended period was upheld because prior conduct under VCES negated bona fide belief, sustaining th.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2025 09:27:34 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2025 09:27:35 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=874685" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Public water supply pipeline works contract tax exemption under Sl. No. 12 denied; service tax demand, interest, penalties upheld</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95520</link>
      <description>The dominant issue was whether works contract services for a public water supply scheme (pipeline laying and allied works) provided to a government authority were exempt under specified notifications/entries, including Sl. No. 12 of Notification No. 25/2012-ST. The tribunal held exemption applies only if the activities strictly fall within the notification; on examining the nature of work, the claimed exemption was denied and the corresponding service tax demand sustained, while the demand relating to exempt water-treatment/sewerage-related works (including certain underground reservoir/ranney well works) was correctly dropped. On limitation, extended period was upheld because prior conduct under VCES negated bona fide belief, sustaining th.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2025 09:27:34 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95520</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>