<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1666 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784126</link>
    <description>The assessee was entitled to one final opportunity to submit and have Forms C, E-I and E-II considered for the relevant assessment period. Given the non-production of the declarations within time, the prior appellate permission to consider forms uploaded up to the date of its order, the change in the indirect tax regime, and the absence of prejudice to the State, the Court allowed submission of the forms and remitted the matter for fresh reassessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2025 09:27:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=874681" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1666 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784126</link>
      <description>The assessee was entitled to one final opportunity to submit and have Forms C, E-I and E-II considered for the relevant assessment period. Given the non-production of the declarations within time, the prior appellate permission to consider forms uploaded up to the date of its order, the change in the indirect tax regime, and the absence of prejudice to the State, the Court allowed submission of the forms and remitted the matter for fresh reassessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT / Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784126</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>