<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1674 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784134</link>
    <description>Where an investigative report forms the basis of the authority&#039;s satisfaction to initiate prosecution, it is a relevant and material document that must ordinarily be disclosed to the person proceeded against to ensure a fair defence. The SEBI investigation report was treated as an intrinsic part of the decision-making process, not a mere internal record, and disclosure was required because relevance and nexus with the action taken govern the duty of supply, not the authority&#039;s label. Limited redaction was permissible only for confidential third-party or market-sensitive material. The accused was entitled to the report.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2025 09:27:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=874673" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1674 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784134</link>
      <description>Where an investigative report forms the basis of the authority&#039;s satisfaction to initiate prosecution, it is a relevant and material document that must ordinarily be disclosed to the person proceeded against to ensure a fair defence. The SEBI investigation report was treated as an intrinsic part of the decision-making process, not a mere internal record, and disclosure was required because relevance and nexus with the action taken govern the duty of supply, not the authority&#039;s label. Limited redaction was permissible only for confidential third-party or market-sensitive material. The accused was entitled to the report.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>SEBI</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784134</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>