<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1679 - CUSTOMS AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784139</link>
    <description>Classification of roasted areca nuts was declined under s. 28-I(2) of the Customs Act, 1962 because an identical classification issue had already been conclusively upheld by an HC, barring a fresh advance ruling; the application was not allowed on that item. Classification of menthol-scented sweet supari was not ruled upon since a similar matter is pending before an HC and operation of the earlier ruling has been stayed, requiring judicial discipline; no ruling was issued, with liberty to reapply after final adjudication. Roasted and/or salted cashew nuts were held classifiable under CTH 2008, specifically CTI 20081910, because roasting is a distinct &quot;preparation/preservation&quot; process not covered by Chs. 7, 8 or 11; the applicant&#039;s classification was accepted, and exemption under the cited notifications was made conditional on proof of origin under the applicable Rules of Origin.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2025 09:27:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=874668" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1679 - CUSTOMS AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS, MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784139</link>
      <description>Classification of roasted areca nuts was declined under s. 28-I(2) of the Customs Act, 1962 because an identical classification issue had already been conclusively upheld by an HC, barring a fresh advance ruling; the application was not allowed on that item. Classification of menthol-scented sweet supari was not ruled upon since a similar matter is pending before an HC and operation of the earlier ruling has been stayed, requiring judicial discipline; no ruling was issued, with liberty to reapply after final adjudication. Roasted and/or salted cashew nuts were held classifiable under CTH 2008, specifically CTI 20081910, because roasting is a distinct &quot;preparation/preservation&quot; process not covered by Chs. 7, 8 or 11; the applicant&#039;s classification was accepted, and exemption under the cited notifications was made conditional on proof of origin under the applicable Rules of Origin.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784139</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>