<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1696 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784156</link>
    <description>The dominant issue was whether subscription fees received for providing online access to pharmaceutical market research reports constituted &quot;royalty&quot; under the India-Switzerland DTAA and were deemed to accrue or arise in India. The Tribunal held that the receipts were for access to information/reports on a subscription basis and did not involve transfer of copyright, use of any copyright rights, or licensing of intellectual property so as to fall within the treaty definition of royalty; following its earlier order in the taxpayer&#039;s own case, it rejected the revenue&#039;s characterization. Consequently, the addition made by the AO pursuant to DRP directions was deleted, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Dec 2025 15:41:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=874651" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1696 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784156</link>
      <description>The dominant issue was whether subscription fees received for providing online access to pharmaceutical market research reports constituted &quot;royalty&quot; under the India-Switzerland DTAA and were deemed to accrue or arise in India. The Tribunal held that the receipts were for access to information/reports on a subscription basis and did not involve transfer of copyright, use of any copyright rights, or licensing of intellectual property so as to fall within the treaty definition of royalty; following its earlier order in the taxpayer&#039;s own case, it rejected the revenue&#039;s characterization. Consequently, the addition made by the AO pursuant to DRP directions was deleted, the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784156</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>