<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (2) TMI 1300 - SC Order</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465515</link>
    <description>In a prosecution under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, the dominant issue was whether the accused should be granted bail after framing of charge. The SC directed that the accused be produced forthwith before the Special Court and held that the Special Court shall enlarge the accused on bail on appropriate terms and conditions to operate until disposal of the case. The appeal was allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2025 17:19:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=874622" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (2) TMI 1300 - SC Order</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465515</link>
      <description>In a prosecution under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, the dominant issue was whether the accused should be granted bail after framing of charge. The SC directed that the accused be produced forthwith before the Special Court and held that the Special Court shall enlarge the accused on bail on appropriate terms and conditions to operate until disposal of the case. The appeal was allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Feb 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465515</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>