<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (11) TMI 112 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48977</link>
    <description>The Tribunal accepted the Commissioner&#039;s explanation for the delay in implementing its order, finding that the order had been complied with. The Tribunal closed the proceedings after accepting the apology and determining that the delay was not intentional.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 15:02:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87457" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (11) TMI 112 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48977</link>
      <description>The Tribunal accepted the Commissioner&#039;s explanation for the delay in implementing its order, finding that the order had been complied with. The Tribunal closed the proceedings after accepting the apology and determining that the delay was not intentional.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48977</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>