<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Unrecorded â‚¹25 crore cash loan claim based on directors&#039; statements-treated as unexplained money u/s69A/115BBE; addition deleted</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95493</link>
    <description>The dominant issue was whether cash of Rs.25 crore, alleged to be advanced as an unrecorded loan based on directors&#039; statements, could be taxed as unexplained money under s. 69A read with s. 115BBE. The appellate authority accepted the assessee&#039;s explanation supported by a contemporaneous loan agreement and consistent business conduct as an NBFC charging high interest on loans with corresponding TDS credits reflected in returns; the Revenue failed to disprove the agreement&#039;s authenticity or identify any infirmity in the findings. Consequently, deletion of the addition was affirmed and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed. - ITAT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2025 08:56:35 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2025 08:56:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=874507" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Unrecorded â‚¹25 crore cash loan claim based on directors&#039; statements-treated as unexplained money u/s69A/115BBE; addition deleted</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95493</link>
      <description>The dominant issue was whether cash of Rs.25 crore, alleged to be advanced as an unrecorded loan based on directors&#039; statements, could be taxed as unexplained money under s. 69A read with s. 115BBE. The appellate authority accepted the assessee&#039;s explanation supported by a contemporaneous loan agreement and consistent business conduct as an NBFC charging high interest on loans with corresponding TDS credits reflected in returns; the Revenue failed to disprove the agreement&#039;s authenticity or identify any infirmity in the findings. Consequently, deletion of the addition was affirmed and the Revenue&#039;s appeal was dismissed. - ITAT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2025 08:56:35 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95493</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>