https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784080 Inordinate and unexplained delay in seeking recall was treated as fatal where the applicant knew of the withdrawal order soon after it was passed. The explanation that action was awaited from the Company Secretary was rejected because the representative's authority had not been withdrawn and the record showed participation in the proceedings. The withdrawal order was treated as a consent order passed through an authorised representative, and inherent powers could not be used as a substitute for review or recall in the absence of any legal vacuum. The recall request was therefore held impermissible on these facts. en-us Mon, 18 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Dec 2025 08:56:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784080 Inordinate and unexplained delay in seeking recall was treated as fatal where the applicant knew of the withdrawal order soon after it was passed. The explanation that action was awaited from the Company Secretary was rejected because the representative's authority had not been withdrawn and the record showed participation in the proceedings. The withdrawal order was treated as a consent order passed through an authorised representative, and inherent powers could not be used as a substitute for review or recall in the absence of any legal vacuum. The recall request was therefore held impermissible on these facts. Case-Laws Companies Law Mon, 18 Aug 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784080