https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784092 The dominant issue was whether any part of the cause of action arose within this HC's territorial jurisdiction to challenge the Designated Authority's final findings in an anti-dumping investigation. Applying SC law that jurisdiction depends on pleaded facts showing cause of action wholly or partly within the territory, the HC held that the writ alleged illegality, arbitrariness, non-application of mind, perversity, and breach of Rule 16/natural justice in the making of the final findings, but pleaded no facts connecting the infringement to the State; mere apprehension of downstream business impact was not an integral fact constituting cause of action. As the alleged denial of fair procedure occurred in Delhi, the HC lacked jurisdiction and dismissed the petition. en-us Mon, 22 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 29 Dec 2025 08:56:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784092 The dominant issue was whether any part of the cause of action arose within this HC's territorial jurisdiction to challenge the Designated Authority's final findings in an anti-dumping investigation. Applying SC law that jurisdiction depends on pleaded facts showing cause of action wholly or partly within the territory, the HC held that the writ alleged illegality, arbitrariness, non-application of mind, perversity, and breach of Rule 16/natural justice in the making of the final findings, but pleaded no facts connecting the infringement to the State; mere apprehension of downstream business impact was not an integral fact constituting cause of action. As the alleged denial of fair procedure occurred in Delhi, the HC lacked jurisdiction and dismissed the petition. Case-Laws Customs Mon, 22 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784092