<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (9) TMI 116 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48964</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, upheld the decision of the Larger Bench in the case of Collector of Central Excise, Bombay v. Automats (India). The Tribunal stressed judicial discipline and propriety and referred the matter to the regular Bench for additional review on merits.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 14:00:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87444" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (9) TMI 116 - CESTAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48964</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi, upheld the decision of the Larger Bench in the case of Collector of Central Excise, Bombay v. Automats (India). The Tribunal stressed judicial discipline and propriety and referred the matter to the regular Bench for additional review on merits.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48964</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>