https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465495 The dominant issue was whether a co-accused was entitled to permission to obtain certified copies of documents. The SC held that the applicant failed to disclose any specific necessity or justification for requiring the documents, and mere status as a co-accused in related proceedings did not establish entitlement. Consequently, the request for certified copies was refused and the application was dismissed. The SC further observed that if the applicant was not receiving proper legal aid, the applicant could approach the concerned District Judge, who should ensure provision of appropriate legal aid. en-us Wed, 10 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 27 Dec 2025 18:00:22 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465495 The dominant issue was whether a co-accused was entitled to permission to obtain certified copies of documents. The SC held that the applicant failed to disclose any specific necessity or justification for requiring the documents, and mere status as a co-accused in related proceedings did not establish entitlement. Consequently, the request for certified copies was refused and the application was dismissed. The SC further observed that if the applicant was not receiving proper legal aid, the applicant could approach the concerned District Judge, who should ensure provision of appropriate legal aid. Case-Laws GST Wed, 10 Apr 2024 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=465495