<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>SC delivered key verdicts on presidential reference, Waqf law in 2025</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=65921</link>
    <description>The Supreme Court held that it cannot impose fixed timelines on governors or the president to grant assent to bills but emphasised that gubernatorial powers are not unfettered. The Court reviewed the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, deeming deletion of the &quot;waqf by user&quot; provision prima facie not arbitrary while staying certain clauses, including a five year practice requirement to create waqf, leaving those provisions subject to further adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2025 11:31:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2025 11:31:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=874341" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>SC delivered key verdicts on presidential reference, Waqf law in 2025</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=65921</link>
      <description>The Supreme Court held that it cannot impose fixed timelines on governors or the president to grant assent to bills but emphasised that gubernatorial powers are not unfettered. The Court reviewed the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, deeming deletion of the &quot;waqf by user&quot; provision prima facie not arbitrary while staying certain clauses, including a five year practice requirement to create waqf, leaving those provisions subject to further adjudication.</description>
      <category>News</category>
      <law>-</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2025 11:31:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/news?id=65921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>