<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Del credere agent&#039;s supply and invoicing liability treated as operational debt under IBC; Section 9 insolvency admission upheld, appeal dismissed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95457</link>
    <description>Debt arising under a Del Credere Agent arrangement was held to qualify as &quot;operational debt&quot; under ss. 5(20)-5(21) IBC because the agent assumed responsibility for procurement, supply, invoicing, receipt of payments, and statutory compliance, and became financially liable to the supplier upon the corporate debtor&#039;s default, giving it an enforceable claim for amounts due; the admission of the s. 9 application was upheld. Objections based on absence of GST returns/e-way bills were treated as procedural and outweighed by invoices, delivery records, payment documents, and debtor admissions establishing supply and liability; privity objections failed as the arrangement operated as a tri-partite understanding by conduct and notification. Contempt was declined as the RP&#039;s clarifications were bona fide. Appeal dismissed - NCLAT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2025 08:06:01 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2025 08:06:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=874310" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Del credere agent&#039;s supply and invoicing liability treated as operational debt under IBC; Section 9 insolvency admission upheld, appeal dismissed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95457</link>
      <description>Debt arising under a Del Credere Agent arrangement was held to qualify as &quot;operational debt&quot; under ss. 5(20)-5(21) IBC because the agent assumed responsibility for procurement, supply, invoicing, receipt of payments, and statutory compliance, and became financially liable to the supplier upon the corporate debtor&#039;s default, giving it an enforceable claim for amounts due; the admission of the s. 9 application was upheld. Objections based on absence of GST returns/e-way bills were treated as procedural and outweighed by invoices, delivery records, payment documents, and debtor admissions establishing supply and liability; privity objections failed as the arrangement operated as a tri-partite understanding by conduct and notification. Contempt was declined as the RP&#039;s clarifications were bona fide. Appeal dismissed - NCLAT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>IBC</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2025 08:06:01 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95457</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>