<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Third-party search evidence on alleged rigged share accommodation entries-reassessment u/ss147/148 quashed; s.153C applies instead.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95455</link>
    <description>Where incriminating material relating to the assessee was found only during search/survey action conducted at a third party&#039;s premises, the statutory trigger for assessment is s.153C and not reassessment under ss.147/148. Since there was no search on the assessee and the Revenue&#039;s case arose entirely from material seized from the third party allegedly engaged in providing accommodation entries through rigged shares, initiation and completion of assessment under s.147 read with s.144B lacked jurisdiction. Consequently, the reassessment order was held void ab initio and was quashed, granting relief to the assessee. - ITAT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2025 08:06:01 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2025 08:06:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=874308" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Third-party search evidence on alleged rigged share accommodation entries-reassessment u/ss147/148 quashed; s.153C applies instead.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95455</link>
      <description>Where incriminating material relating to the assessee was found only during search/survey action conducted at a third party&#039;s premises, the statutory trigger for assessment is s.153C and not reassessment under ss.147/148. Since there was no search on the assessee and the Revenue&#039;s case arose entirely from material seized from the third party allegedly engaged in providing accommodation entries through rigged shares, initiation and completion of assessment under s.147 read with s.144B lacked jurisdiction. Consequently, the reassessment order was held void ab initio and was quashed, granting relief to the assessee. - ITAT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2025 08:06:01 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95455</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>