<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Attaching alleged crime proceeds and equivalent-value assets, including pre-offence and mortgaged property, upheld despite non-accused ownership</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95439</link>
    <description>Properties representing &quot;proceeds of crime&quot; can be provisionally attached even when held by persons not named as accused in the FIR or charge-sheet, since PMLA aims to trace and secure proceeds in whosoever&#039;s possession; accordingly, the challenge on this ground was rejected. Properties acquired prior to the scheduled offence period are also attachable as &quot;value thereof&quot; under the second limb of the definition of &quot;proceeds of crime&quot;; hence, attachment of equivalent-value assets was upheld. Release was declined because PMLA does not require a direct nexus where attachment is based on indirect acquisition or &quot;value thereof.&quot; Mortgaged assets were held attachable to prevent alienation; secured creditors may seek auction through the Special Judge with safeguards for surplus deposit. Appeal dismissed. - AT</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2025 08:06:01 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2025 08:06:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=874292" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Attaching alleged crime proceeds and equivalent-value assets, including pre-offence and mortgaged property, upheld despite non-accused ownership</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95439</link>
      <description>Properties representing &quot;proceeds of crime&quot; can be provisionally attached even when held by persons not named as accused in the FIR or charge-sheet, since PMLA aims to trace and secure proceeds in whosoever&#039;s possession; accordingly, the challenge on this ground was rejected. Properties acquired prior to the scheduled offence period are also attachable as &quot;value thereof&quot; under the second limb of the definition of &quot;proceeds of crime&quot;; hence, attachment of equivalent-value assets was upheld. Release was declined because PMLA does not require a direct nexus where attachment is based on indirect acquisition or &quot;value thereof.&quot; Mortgaged assets were held attachable to prevent alienation; secured creditors may seek auction through the Special Judge with safeguards for surplus deposit. Appeal dismissed. - AT</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2025 08:06:01 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=95439</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>