<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2003 (5) TMI 78 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48946</link>
    <description>Refund of a pre-deposit was recognised as carrying interest where payment was delayed after an earlier final order granting consequential relief. The Department&#039;s later refusal to refund on limitation could not defeat relief already granted by the Tribunal, and the administrative circular was treated as supporting interest on delayed refund. Interest was fixed at 12% per annum, running from the expiry of three months after receipt of the earlier final order.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Aug 2010 13:27:15 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=87426" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2003 (5) TMI 78 - CEGAT, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48946</link>
      <description>Refund of a pre-deposit was recognised as carrying interest where payment was delayed after an earlier final order granting consequential relief. The Department&#039;s later refusal to refund on limitation could not defeat relief already granted by the Tribunal, and the administrative circular was treated as supporting interest on delayed refund. Interest was fixed at 12% per annum, running from the expiry of three months after receipt of the earlier final order.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 May 2003 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=48946</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>