<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1581 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784041</link>
    <description>Payments treated as commission/brokerage were held not liable to TDS under s.194H on the facts already decided in the assessee&#039;s own earlier years; consequently, no disallowance could be made under s.40(a)(ia). Expenditure on items such as pen drives, laptops, cables and hard disks was held to be revenue in nature, following binding co-ordinate bench precedent; the deletion of the capitalisation/disallowance was sustained. Additions from recomputation by disallowing amounts under ss.37-43B (including provisions, prior-period items, loss on sale of assets, etc.), disallowance of write-back of excess provisions, and related s.40(a)(ia) adjustments were deleted as covered by earlier orders. Exempt dividend income under s.10(34) was allowed for an insurer, and s.14A was held inapplicable; reopening on this issue was treated as change of opinion and invalid. Exemption under s.10(15)(iv)(h) and depreciation under s.32 were allowed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2025 08:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=874251" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1581 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784041</link>
      <description>Payments treated as commission/brokerage were held not liable to TDS under s.194H on the facts already decided in the assessee&#039;s own earlier years; consequently, no disallowance could be made under s.40(a)(ia). Expenditure on items such as pen drives, laptops, cables and hard disks was held to be revenue in nature, following binding co-ordinate bench precedent; the deletion of the capitalisation/disallowance was sustained. Additions from recomputation by disallowing amounts under ss.37-43B (including provisions, prior-period items, loss on sale of assets, etc.), disallowance of write-back of excess provisions, and related s.40(a)(ia) adjustments were deleted as covered by earlier orders. Exempt dividend income under s.10(34) was allowed for an insurer, and s.14A was held inapplicable; reopening on this issue was treated as change of opinion and invalid. Exemption under s.10(15)(iv)(h) and depreciation under s.32 were allowed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784041</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>