https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784052 In bail-cancellation proceedings arising from alleged GST evasion under the CGST Act, the court held that the gravity of an economic offence by itself did not justify recalling bail where the investigation remained incomplete for years, no complaint had been filed, and no misuse of liberty was shown. Although economic offences require a stricter approach at the bail stage, the investigating agency's failure to complete the inquiry within time weighed against interference. The earlier bail was therefore maintained, with the court noting that default bail would have been available if the investigation had continued to remain incomplete. en-us Wed, 17 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 30 Dec 2025 18:01:08 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784052 In bail-cancellation proceedings arising from alleged GST evasion under the CGST Act, the court held that the gravity of an economic offence by itself did not justify recalling bail where the investigation remained incomplete for years, no complaint had been filed, and no misuse of liberty was shown. Although economic offences require a stricter approach at the bail stage, the investigating agency's failure to complete the inquiry within time weighed against interference. The earlier bail was therefore maintained, with the court noting that default bail would have been available if the investigation had continued to remain incomplete. Case-Laws GST Wed, 17 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784052