<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2025 (12) TMI 1596 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784056</link>
    <description>General penalty under s.125 CGST/SGST for failure to file annual returns was held inapplicable where late fee had already been levied under s.47, since s.125 operates only where no specific penalty/late fee is provided; consequently, the general penalty was quashed. On late fee under s.47(2), the HC held the authority erred in computing the statutory maximum separately for CGST and SGST; the permissible aggregate late fee had to be determined first and only then apportioned equally between CGST and SGST, resulting in a reduced late fee. The petitioner was directed to pay the corrected late fee, upon which the bank account was ordered to be defrozen.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2025 08:06:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=874236" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2025 (12) TMI 1596 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784056</link>
      <description>General penalty under s.125 CGST/SGST for failure to file annual returns was held inapplicable where late fee had already been levied under s.47, since s.125 operates only where no specific penalty/late fee is provided; consequently, the general penalty was quashed. On late fee under s.47(2), the HC held the authority erred in computing the statutory maximum separately for CGST and SGST; the permissible aggregate late fee had to be determined first and only then apportioned equally between CGST and SGST, resulting in a reduced late fee. The petitioner was directed to pay the corrected late fee, upon which the bank account was ordered to be defrozen.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 12 Dec 2025 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=784056</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>